|

Design
News - March 2007
Story By: Joseph Ogando - Senior Editor, Motion Control
Mechanical Isolators Stop the Shakes

Minus K's vibration isolation systems come in a variety
of form factors. This bench top model is one of the smallest
models, and has recently gained some popularity among
audiophiles who want to protect their turntables. |
A little-known mechanical
alternative
to air tables
and active vibration isolators
tackles the low-frequency
vibrations that increasingly
plague sensitive imaging and measurement systems
|
BUILDINGS REALLY DO SHAKE AND SWAY UNDER OUR FEET.
Most of us don't even notice these low-frequency vibrations,
but they can bother the researchers who use sophisticated
imaging systems or test instruments. Whether the cause is
the wind or a nearby HVAC system, low-frequency vibrations
can wreak havoc with the data from scanning probe microscopes,
interferometers, micro-hardness testers and other types of
sensitive test and measurement equipment. This vibration problem
mostly affects researchers who work at atomic and nanoscale
resolutions, but the problem is getting worse.
It's not that buildings are getting shakier. Nor are resolution
needs of the research community changing. "The highest
resolution requirements have been there from day one,"
says Mark Flowers, executive director of Nanoscience Instruments,
a distributor of atomic force microscopes and related instruments
used in nanotechnology research. He instead attributes the
growing awareness of vibration problems to the fact that high-resolution
work has become more common. With medical science and nanotechnology
on the upswing, "more people are working at the highest
resolutions," Flowers says. And a growing number of these
efforts are commercial or even production-oriented as opposed
to academic.
This popularity has, in turn, led to something of a real
estate shortage. Atomic force microscopes and other types
of scanning microscopes perform best on a solid, stable floor.
Basements have traditionally been considered the prime location
for the most sensitive machines. But with increased academic
and commercial use, basement space is in short supply. "All
the best spots in the basement have been taken," says
Ann Scanlan, president of Herzan, a supplier of vibration
isolators. Suppliers of AFMs and other types of equipment
now routinely deliver equipment to higher floors.
Engineers who have had to contend with low-frequency environmental
vibration have traditionally turned to air tables, which have
the dual advantage of being both cost-effective and familiar.
"Air tables have been the default solution," says
Flowers. More recently, electronic systems that monitor and
actively cancel vibrations have addressed the trickiest applications.
What many engineers don't know is that there is also a unique
mechanical solution available from Minus K Technology. Based
on the sometimes counter-intuitive phenomenon of negative
stiffness, these vibration isolators offer better vibration
isolation than air tables at typical environmental vibration
frequencies - those from 1-80 Hz or so. They also cost from
one-third to one-half the price of active systems, and users
say these mechanical systems do at least as good a job at
quieting low-frequency vibrations.
Here's a look at how this mechanical solution works and how
it stacks up to air tables and active isolation systems.
Going Negative
Minus K makes low-frequency vibration isolators in a variety
of form factors - from small benchtop models capable of supporting
a few pounds to multiple-isolator systems capable of supporting
tens of thousands of pounds. What they all have in common
is the use of negative stiffness mechanisms. While objects
or mechanisms with a positive stiffness oppose an applied
force, much the way a spring does, negative stiffness mechanisms
can amplify an applied force. "Think of the negative
stiffness mechanism as the opposite of a spring." says
David Platus, a PhD engineer who founded Minus K Technology
in 1993 after years of working on vibration isolation problems
for the aerospace industry.
Minus K employs two different kinds of NSMs
in its vibration isolators. The one that handles vertical-motion
isolation consists of a horizontal flexure loaded in compression
at either end (see figure 1). Minus K pairs this NSM with
a stiff spring to support the isolator's payload. As Platus
explains, the spring and NSM achieve a state of equilibrium
in which net vertical stiffness drops by as much as 99 percent
without compromising the spring's static load-bearing capability.
Horizontal-motion isolation comes from vertical metal columns
that connect the bottom of the isolators movable mounting
platform to its fixed base. When axially loaded by the weight
of the payload, the columns exhibit the "beam-column
effect" that reduces their lateral bending stiffness
(see figure 1). Platus says the net horizontal stiffness "can
be made to approach zero as the loading on the beam columns
approaches their critical buckling load."
Minus K's off-the-shelf systems typically have a natural
frequency of 0.5-Hz, or slightly lower with careful tuning,
which is low enough by far to deal with low-frequency building
vibrations that typically range from 1-80 Hz. "What you
need is a natural frequency significantly lower than the vibrations
you're trying to get rid of," Platus notes.
Despite their popularity, air tables can't always achieve
that goal. "If you're having significant problems below
10 Hz, you may not be able to handle it with an air table,"
Platus says, explaining that many air tables can natural frequencies
that overlap with the low end of building vibrations. "Air
tables often have natural frequencies around 2-3 Hz,"
he says. "If your environmental vibrations have the same
magnitude, the air table would actually make the problem worse."
This is a view that suppliers of scanning probe microscopy
products endorse. "Air tables, for the most part, have
been successful," says Patrick O'Hara, president of Ambios
Technology, a supplier of surface metrology instruments. They've
also been the most familiar and lowest cost solution - costing
about half of what Minus K charges for a comparable table-sized
model. But O'Hara adds the Minus K isolators have a performance
advantage that becomes important in high-resolution imaging
applications. "The better the vibration control, the
better the image," he says. "And if you look at
the transmissibility curves, they're at least two times better
with the Minus K technology."
Both O'Hara and Nanoscience's Flowers say they've moved away
from air tables and adopted Minus K's technology when the
imaging applications requires the best possible resolution.
Flowers stresses, however, that many applications still don't
need the best vibration control. The artifacts from low-frequency
vibrations tend to be nano-sized or smaller. "Not everyone
needs to work on that scale," Flowers says.
An Active Alternative
For those who do work on that scale, the real competition
for Minus K from a performance standpoint are active vibration
isolation systems rather than passive air systems. These systems
first sense and then cancel input vibration. They contain
controllers and actuators that can, respectively, calculate
and then generate an equal, out-of-phase force that cancels
the input vibration.

Herzan is a leading distributor of such systems, which are
produced by Herz in Japan and TableStable in Switzerland.
The company's six degrees-of-freedom active isolation systems
have natural frequencies as low as 0.7 Hz, just a hair more
than Minus Ks 0.5-Hz systems. And they come in both bench-top
and table sizes, capable of actively handling vibrations from
1 to 1,000 Hz. Above 1,000 Hz, these systems employ passive
vibration damping methods.
Herzan's active systems do cost more than Minus K's mechanical
isolators. O'Hara, who has used both kinds of isolators,
and says the active models he has bought in the past cost
just over three times as much as comparable Minus K isolators.
For some isolator sizes, though, the price differential
can be smaller. Hcrzan has a $7,000 system that competes
with Minus Ks $4,000 model, according to Scanlan, Herzan's
president.
But does that added cost buy functionality that Minus
K's passive isolators lack? Surprisingly, both Platus
and Scanlan agree it does, though there's less agreement
about whether added functionality is worth the money.
One thing that active systems do better, for example,
is handle sources of vibration on the isolators platform
as well as internal resonances caused by the components
that make up the isolator. "Nuts, bolts and screws
all have their own resonances," says Scanlan. "We're
able to damp those internal resonances." The active
system can likewise cancel vibrations caused by equipment
on the platform, such as a cable. Minus K doesn't really
try to damp these smaller sources of vibration, though
Platus does pick components whose internal resonances
are well above 80 Hz. "Our focus is on low-frequency
environmental vibration," says Platus. |
|
|
The active systems also require less tweaking. Minus K users
do have to make simple adjustments to account for different
loads. For example, they must sometimes change the compressive
force on the vertical NSM. It's a simple adjustment, one performed
by turning a dial. But it's an adjustment that the users of
active systems don't have to make. Once installed, our systems
don't require any tuning." Scanlan says.
Another area where active systems have an advantage - at
least for now - is in the ability to compensate for changes
in load and load distribution on the platform. Scanlan notes
that Herzan's systems take just 5 to 20 ms to settle. "Our
platforms arc about 100 times stiffer than an equivalent 1-Hz
air table," she says. Herzan's systems also include leveling
motors to automatically compensate as loads shift atop the
platform.
Automatic compensation feature becomes important as sensitive
imaging and measurement equipment moves closer to production
settings, which require not just good measurements but fast
measurements. It likewise becomes important when measurement
systems have moving stages, which present inherent load distribution
difficulties.
Minus Ks systems, by contrast, take more like 6-8 sec to
settle. And they require tuning not only if the size of the
load changes but if its distribution changes. "High-speed
moving stages have not been our strong suit," Platus
says.
Still, Minus K does have some tricks that make load-distribution
easier. For one, the company sometimes stiffens the tilt-axis
of its isolators, making them better able to stand firm against.
For another, it has developed quick lock-and-release mechanism
for use with moving stages. And it offers electro-mechanical
device that automatically re-tunes the isolator as loads change
or shift.
Minus K has already dabbled in quasi-static applications
that had slow-moving stages. In one recent job for a semiconductor
manufacturer, for example, the company built an isolation
table with a 350-lb capacity, 90 lb of which was a moving
stage. The stage had to translate up to 7-inchcs in the x
and y axes.
And Platus believes this non-traditional application for
his mechanical isolators is just the beginning. "I'm
sure there are many applications out in industry that we haven't
even thought of yet.
PDF
version of this article
Top
|